PUBLICATION ETHICS

PUBLICATION ETHICS

Our journal is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and adheres to the guidelines set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). We aim to ensure transparency, integrity, and fairness in all aspects of our publication process.

Editorial Practices

  1. Double-Blind Peer Review:
    • The journal employs a double-blind peer review process to ensure impartiality and the highest quality standards.
  2. Editorial Board:
    • Manuscripts are reviewed by qualified and experienced experts from the editorial board or external reviewers.
  3. Continuous Improvement:
    • We welcome suggestions from authors, reviewers, and the editorial board to enhance the quality and integrity of our journal.

Ethical Standards

Authors, reviewers, and editors are expected to adhere to the following ethical principles:

  1. Authorship and Contributions:

    • All contributors to the research must be properly acknowledged, and authorship should accurately reflect individuals' contributions.

  2. Originality and Plagiarism:

    • Submitted manuscripts must be original works of the author(s). Plagiarism, in any form, is unacceptable and will result in immediate action.

  3. Conflicts of Interest:

    • Authors, reviewers, and editors must disclose any conflicts of interest that might influence the objectivity of the research or publication process.

  4. Research Misconduct:

    • Instances of data fabrication, falsification, or redundant publication are strictly prohibited and will be investigated thoroughly. Proven misconduct may lead to retraction of the article and notification of the authors' institutions.

Misconduct Handling

Our journal takes allegations of misconduct seriously and follows a structured approach to resolve issues:

  1. Investigation:
    • Complaints of misconduct are reviewed, and evidence is collected to verify claims.
  2. Communication:
    • Authors are informed of any allegations and allowed to respond or clarify.
  3. Action:
    • If misconduct is confirmed, appropriate actions may include rejection, retraction, or institutional notification.

Changes in Authorship

Requests for authorship changes are considered under the following conditions:

  • Adding or removing authors before or after publication.

To approve changes:

  1. All authors must agree to the proposed adjustments.
  2. In cases of disagreement, the manuscript may be held until resolution, or institutional input may be sought.

Commitment to Ethical Publishing

The journal is dedicated to fostering a trustworthy and credible platform for academic contributions. All parties involved in the publication process must uphold these ethical standards to maintain the integrity of scholarly research.