An Analysis of Grammatical and Lexical Cohesion in Oral Communication Among Japanese Language Learners in University
FULL PAPER PDF, HTML

Keywords

grammatical cohesion, lexical cohesion, Japanese language, oral communication

How to Cite

Anthoney, M. ., & Mamat, R. . (2024). An Analysis of Grammatical and Lexical Cohesion in Oral Communication Among Japanese Language Learners in University. International Journal of Educational Excellence and Innovation, 1(01), 31-41. http://universalscholars.org/index.php/ijeei/article/view/18

Abstract

This research was conducted to investigate the use of discourse cohesion aspects in Japanese Language oral communication in both grammatical cohesion and cohesion lexical. The purpose of the research is to know how the grammatical and lexical cohesion used in the conversation. The instruments were the Japanese Language students from Faculty of Major Language Studies (FPBU) in University Science Islam Malaysia (USIM). 10 students from3rd years students were selected randomly to participate in the dialogue activity to collect the data. The data of this study which then were transcribed into written. The data collected were analysed qualitatively using cohesive devices based on Halliday and Hasan’s (1976). They are reference (personal, demonstrative and comparative), substitution (nominal, verbal and clausal), ellipsis (nominal, verbal and clausal), conjunction (additive, adversative, causal, temporal and others), and lexical cohesion (reiteration and collocation).The results of this research findings showed that the most frequently cohesions appeared in the dialogue are cohesion appeared in the dialogue are reference, substitution, and conjunctions. Meanwhile the occurrences of ellipsis, substitution and lexical reiteration were the least. The roles of the two cohesions can help student’s sentences to be cohesive in their oral communication in Japanese language. The study of cohesion of Japanese language oral communication can also offer some significance to pedagogical field.

FULL PAPER PDF, HTML

References

A., A (2010). Japanese Language Courses: A surging factor into the future (The Foundation of Japanese Studies in Malaysia). Ritsumeikan Studies in Language and Culture, 21(3), 75-81.

Ary,etal.(2010). IntroductiontoResearchinEducation(8thed).California: Wadsworth.

Arumugam,N.,Thayalan,X.,Dass, L.C.,&Maniam,M.(2014).Unemploymentamong graduate nurses in Malaysia: A case study. Asian Social Science, 10(9), 227.

BahaziqAfnan.(2016).CohesiveDevicesinWrittenDiscourse:ADiscourseAnalysisof Student’s Essay Writing. English Language Teaching; Vol. 9, No. 7; 2016 ISSN 1916- 4742 E-ISSN 1916-4750 Published byCanadian Center of Science and Education. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n7p112.

Brown, Gillian & George Yule. (1983). Discourse Analysis. The role of Context in Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistic s, 1(1), 1-3.

Celce-Murcia, M. and Olshtain, E. (2007). Discourse and context in language teaching:A guide for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hymes, D. H. (1971). On communicative competence. In J.B. Pride, & J. Holmes (Eds.) Sociolinguistic. Selected Readings. Harmondswor th: Penguin (pp. 269-293).

Halliday,M.A.K., &Hasan,R.(1976).CohesioninEnglish. London: Longman.Hasan, R.(1968). Grammatical cohesion in spoken and written English: Part one.University College, London (Communication Research Center); Harlow : Longmans.

Johnson, K. E. (1995). Understanding Communication in Second Language Classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lee Su Yeoh, M. K. (2020). The Importance of Japanese Language Skills Proficiency among Malaysian Graduates in Japanese-based Companies. Social Sciences & Humanities, 23.

L., Z. (2017). Language Learning Strategies and Learner Autonomy in . Journal of Advanced Research in , 11.

Ministry of Higher Education (2010).Future direction of language education in Malaysia. Retrieved from http://www.mohe.gov.my/portal/images/penerbitan/JPT/Pengurusan_Pembangunan_Akademik/Buku-buku_Kajian_Hala_Tuju/Future_Direction_of_Language_in_Malaysia.pdf.

Musa, N. C. (2012). Exploring English language learning and teaching in Malaysia. GEMA: Online Journal of Language Studies 12, no. 1 (2012): 35-51, 12.

Narang, V. (1996). Communicative Language Teaching: Papers on the theory and practice of Hindi language pedagody, New Delhi, India: Creative Books.

Oshima, R. and S. Harvey. 2013. The concept of learning Japanese: Explaining why successful stu-dents of Japanese discontinue Japanese study at the transition to tertiary education.The LanguageLearning Journal. DOI: 10.1080/09571736.2013.833646

T., . J. (2015). A Malaysian professional communication skills in English framework for English for occupational purposes courses. United Kingdom: http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/28747/1/AJAT%202015.pd.

YogeshHoleetal2019 J.Phys.:Conf.Ser.1362012121

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Margaret Anthoney, Roslina Mamat (Author)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.